LANAP Versus Conventional Gum Surgery

Which is the Better Treatment for Gum Disease?

Gum disease is a severe dental disorder that affects millions of people across the globe. It can cause tooth loss, jawbone damage, and even systemic health problems if left untreated. To treat gum disease, dental experts use two main methods: LANAP (Laser-Assisted New Attachment Procedure) and classic gum surgery.

In this blog, we will contrast LANAP with standard gum surgery, outlining their advantages and disadvantages, so that you may make an informed decision regarding which treatment is best for you.


  • LANAP is a minimally invasive treatment that does not include any gum cutting or suturing.
  • Painless: Unlike traditional gum surgery, LANAP is virtually painless. During the surgery, patients report minor discomfort.
  • LANAP patients often report a substantially quicker recovery period than those who undergo standard gum surgery.
  • Because LANAP exclusively removes diseased tissue, it aids in the preservation of good gum tissue.
  • LANAP improves oral health by eliminating the germs responsible for gum disease and boosting healing.

LANAP: Negatives

  • LANAP is only conducted by dentists with specialized training and the required equipment and experience.
  • Although LANAP is cost-effective in the long run, the initial cost is often more than that of conventional gum surgery.

Pros of Traditional Gum Surgery

  • Traditional gum surgery is readily available, and the majority of dental specialists possess the necessary skills and equipment to execute the procedure.
  • Traditional periodontal surgery is often less expensive than LANAP.

Cons of Traditional Gum Surgery

  • Traditional gum surgery is an invasive technique that needs the gums to be sliced and stitched.
  • After traditional gum surgery, patients often endure substantial pain and discomfort during the healing period.
  • Traditional gum surgery needs a lengthier recovery period than LANAP, with some patients requiring several weeks to recover completely.
  • Because traditional gum surgery includes cutting and removing healthy gum tissue, it can lead to more oral health complications in the future.

So, which is preferable:

LANAP or conventional gum surgery?

In the end, the decision will depend on your particular requirements and circumstances. If you are seeking a minimally invasive, painless, and successful treatment for gum disease, LANAP may be the best option. If you are searching for a less expensive solution, though, traditional gum surgery may be the way to go.

We recommend contacting Dr. Joe Nemeth if you reside in Southfield, Michigan and are interested in learning more about LANAP and traditional gum surgery. Dr. Nemeth is a highly skilled dentist who is committed to assisting his patients in achieving and maintaining optimal oral health.

In conclusion, both LANAP and conventional gum surgery are effective treatments for gum disease. The choice between the two will rely on your particular requirements and conditions. Contact Dr. Joe Nemeth as soon as possible for a consultation if you are battling with gum disease and are unsure of the appropriate treatment.